Last patch doesn't apllied :-(
[root@helios linux-2.4.19]# gzip -cd kinoded-8-2.4.19-pre3.diff.gz |
patch -p1
patching file fs/inode.c
Hunk #4 FAILED at 698.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1119 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1278 (offset -1 lines).
1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/inode.c.rej
inode.c.rej:
***************
*** 697,731 ****
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
dispose_list(freeable);
/*
- * If we didn't freed enough clean inodes schedule
- * a sync of the dirty inodes, we cannot do it
- * from here or we're either synchronously dogslow
- * or we deadlock with oom.
*/
if (goal)
- schedule_task(&unused_inodes_flush_task);
}
int shrink_icache_memory(int priority, int gfp_mask)
{
int count = 0;
-
- /*
- * Nasty deadlock avoidance..
- *
- * We may hold various FS locks, and we don't
- * want to recurse into the FS that called us
- * in clear_inode() and friends..
- */
- if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS))
- return 0;
-
count = inodes_stat.nr_unused / priority;
-
prune_icache(count);
- kmem_cache_shrink(inode_cachep);
return 0;
}
--- 698,729 ----
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
dispose_list(freeable);
+ kmem_cache_shrink(inode_cachep);
/*
+ * If we didn't freed enough clean inodes
+ * start a sync now
*/
if (goal)
+ try_to_sync_unused_inodes();
+ }
+
+ void prune_icache(int goal) {
+ if (!atomic_read(&kinoded_goal)) {
+ atomic_set(&kinoded_goal, goal) ;
+ wake_up_interruptible(&kinoded_wait);
+ }
+ /* otherwise, kinoded has already been woken up, move on
+ ** to other caches that might be shrinkable instead of spending time
+ ** waiting for kinoded to make progress
+ */
}
int shrink_icache_memory(int priority, int gfp_mask)
{
int count = 0;
count = inodes_stat.nr_unused / priority;
prune_icache(count);
return 0;
}
---
Serge Kolodeznyh
Paradigma AG
Network /system administrator
SVK42-RIPN / SVK33-RIPE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oleg Drokin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Serge Kolodeznyh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] quota support ?
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 05:12:09PM +0400, Serge Kolodeznyh wrote:
>
> > Who know, will quota support and fs at all be working, if my kernel is
> > 2.4.19 version, and make the patches for quota support from reiserfs
site ?
> > The problem is that reiser's patches are for 2.4.19-pre3, not clean
2.4.19.
>
> This is not a problem. Everything should work fine if applies correctly.
>
> Bye,
> Oleg
>
