Only data in syslog relevant was:
what I believe to be the original error:
Aug 28 15:33:26 recluce kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device
09:00) ...
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: reiserfs: replayed 1 transactions in 2
seconds
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: is_tree_node: node level 1 does not match to
the expected one 4
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 26542. Fsck?
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure
occurred trying to find stat data of [1 2 0x0 SD]
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: is_tree_node: node level 1 does not match to
the expected one 4
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 26542. Fsck?
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: vs-2140: finish_unfinished: search_by_key
returned -2
Aug 28 15:33:27 recluce kernel: ReiserFS version 3.6.25
Aug 28 15:33:43 recluce kernel: raid5: switching cache buffer size, 4096 -->
512
Aug 28 15:33:43 recluce kernel: FAT: bogus logical sector size 0
Aug 28 15:33:43 recluce kernel: VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on
dev 09:00.
Aug 28 15:33:49 recluce kernel: raid5: switching cache buffer size, 512 -->
4096
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device
09:00) ...
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: is_tree_node: node level 1 does not match to
the expected one 4
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 26542. Fsck?
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure
occurred trying to find stat data of [1 2 0x0 SD]
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: is_tree_node: node level 1 does not match to
the expected one 4
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 26542. Fsck?
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: vs-2140: finish_unfinished: search_by_key
returned -2
Aug 28 15:33:50 recluce kernel: ReiserFS version 3.6.25
current errors:
reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 16:41) ...
Using r5 hash to sort names
ReiserFS version 3.6.25
raid5: switching cache buffer size, 1024 --> 4096
dev 09:00: Unfinished reiserfsck --rebuild-tree run detected. Please run
reiserfsck --rebuild-tree and wait for a completion. If that fails
get newer reiserfsprogs package
raid5: switching cache buffer size, 4096 --> 1024
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on (dev 09:00, block 8,
size 1024)
and
dev 09:00: Unfinished reiserfsck --rebuild-tree run detected. Please run
reiserfsck --rebuild-tree and wait for a completion. If that fails get newer
reiserfsprogs package
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on (dev 09:00, block
2,size 4096)
PS: I had to subscribe to post, but forgot to edit out the part saying I
wasnt subscribed, you can disregard that ;)
Sam Bingner
PACAF CSS/SCHE
Contractor RSIS
DSN 315 449-7889
COMM 808 449-7889
-----Original Message-----
From: Vitaly Fertman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:33 PM
To: Bingner Sam J Contractor PACAF CSS/SCHE; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] FW: Problem with reiserfsck --rebuild-tree
Hi,
Do you see anything related in your syslog, like I/O errors or similar?
please send me the metadata dump of your partition:
debugreiserfs -p /dev/md0 | bzip -c > md0.bz2
On Friday 30 August 2002 12:19, Bingner Sam J Contractor PACAF CSS/SCHE
wrote:
> <<rebuild.log.gz>>
> I had some corruption on my drive, and it hammered the FS (and alot of
> the files I'm sure) ... so I had to run reiserfsck --rebuild-tree ...
> I'm attaching the output as well as the logfile, it looks like it's
> finding alot of good dirs etc, but it's getting a segfault... any help
> would be greatly appreciated...
>
> my tape drive is FUBAR, so unfortunately, no I don't have a backup of
> everything ;)
>
> Lastly, I'm not subscribed to the list. Please CC me at either this
> address or [EMAIL PROTECTED] on all replies... thanks :)
>
> Sam
>
> <-------------reiserfsck, 2002------------->
> reiserfsprogs 3.6.3
>
> **********************************************************
> ** This is an experimental version of reiserfsck, **
> ** !! MAKE A BACKUP FIRST !! **
> ** Don't run this program unless something is broken. **
> ** Some types of random FS damage can be recovered from **
> ** by this program, which basically throws away **
> ** the internal nodes of the tree and then reconstructs **
> ** them. This program is for use only by the desperate, **
> ** and is of only beta quality. If you are using the **
> ** latest reiserfsprogs and it fails please email **
> ** bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **
> **********************************************************
>
> Will rebuild the filesystem (/dev/md0) tree
> Will put log info to 'rebuild.log'
>
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
