Hello!

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Sewell, Cassandra D (Cassandra) wrote:
> I am seeing the following messages on a system I have at boot time.  This system 
> is running the 2.2.17 kernel w/ RFS 3.5.32.  I am awaiting delivery of the harddrive 
>& 

version 3.5.32 is way too old, there are never versions available.

> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: ReiserFS version 3.5.32 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: 03:0c: rw=0, want=65, limit=0 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: dev 03:0c blksize=1024 blocknr=64 sector=128 size=1024 
>count=1 

Hm, this device is of zero size. Very strange.

> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: 03:0d: rw=0, want=65, limit=0 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: dev 03:0d blksize=1024 blocknr=64 sector=128 size=1024 
>count=1 

One more zero-sized partition.

> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: 03:0e: rw=0, want=65, limit=0 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: dev 03:0e blksize=1024 blocknr=64 sector=128 size=1024 
>count=1 

And third zero sized partition.

> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: ReiserFS version 3.5.32 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: reiserfs_read_super: can't find a reiserfs filesystem 
>on dev 03:0b. 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: reiserfs_read_super: try to find super block in old 
>location 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: reiserfs_read_super: can't find a reiserfs filesystem 
>on dev 03:0b. 

Hm, hard to tell about this one.
What does reiserfsck (pick latest one!) says about /dev/hda11?

> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: Checking ReiserFS transaction log (device 03:05) ... 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: Replayed 127 transactions in 3 seconds 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names 
> Dec 31 19:35:32 **** kernel: ReiserFS version 3.5.32 

This one mounted ok.

So it seems that several extended partitions are corrupted
(or just missed - you have not posted relevant part of the log).
These are /dev/hda12 /dev/hda13 /dev/hda14.

Bye,
    Oleg

Reply via email to