Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:45:04PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Sunday 18 April 2004 17:26, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > > Hi, > > > :0 B > * H ?? Content-Type: multipart > * Content-Type: text/html > * ! Content-Type: text/plain > * ! ^Received: > /dev/null > #The Received check is there because I am a postmaster.
procmail is BAAAAD :) we use a really small bit of shell instead # we check if message was spoiled by spamassassin in previous # round of spamcheck (qmailq). preflag=`printf "%s\n" "$input" | $M822FIELD X-Spam-Flag | sed 's/^ //'` if [ "$preflag" = "YES" ]; then # .. and if its spammy enough already, we reinject. printf "%s\n" "$input" | $FORWARDBIN $FORWARD if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then #so qmail will not do any further deliveries in .qmail file exit 99 fi # problem calling inject - temp failure exit 111 fi # i cant send HTML only to /dev/null cause Hans Reiser thinks ASCII (we are all using) is obsoleted by *ML's ;) but we do a lil tweakig there and there, changing weights and writing new spamassassin rules. for example for today spamassassin blocked 162 spam messages that were sent to this list ;) well some got through. we are not perfect, but i'm working on it (being perfect).. > Also block mail from IP addresses known to be open relays, open proxies, > rooted boxes, etc. its intresting discussion, but lets move it off the list. -- "the liberation loophole will make it clear.." lex lyamin
