On Wed 21 April 2004 11:55, Vitaly Fertman wrote: Hi Vitaly,
Thanks for your reply! > would you try this patch, it should fix the problem, > email me about the result please. I got several rejects: patching file librepair/repair.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file librepair/repair.c.rej patching file plugin/key/key_large/key_large.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 295. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file plugin/key/key_large/key_large.c.rej patching file plugin/key/key_short/key_short.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file plugin/key/key_short/key_short.c.rej patching file plugin/object/dir40/dir40.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 488 (offset 12 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 579 (offset 12 lines). patching file plugin/object/dir40/dir40_repair.c patching file plugin/object/obj40/obj40.c patching file plugin/object/obj40/obj40.h patching file plugin/object/obj40/obj40_repair.c patching file plugin/object/reg40/reg40.c patching file plugin/object/reg40/reg40_repair.c patching file plugin/object/spl40/spl40.c patching file plugin/object/spl40/spl40_repair.c patching file plugin/object/sym40/sym40.c patching file plugin/object/sym40/sym40_repair.c > > P.S. How about all these spelling errors in fsck's output? ;) > all spelling fixes are appreciated :) I'll let you know :) Cheers, Ray
