Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:22:55PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 03:18:07PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote: > > Yes, I think it would be nice to have this infrastructure in VFS. Technically. > > But its not possible, cause of "committee clusterfuck". Socially. Stupidly. > > Please explain your problems. I've not seen a single actually working > proposal yet. Current reiser4 implementation apparently oopses and
Not true. If true - send bugreports. Its work for me couple of months. there were few hiccups, but they got fixed quickly by [EMAIL PROTECTED] only ext2 partition is /boot cause of BIOS limitations. Yes, i use it with LVM2 and stuff... de facto its even more stable then reiserfs 3.6, which got issues with CONFIG_PREEMPT. > breaks guaranteed fs semantics, it's not going in in either reiser4 or > the vfs. A > > Al has started a thread to hash out working semantics, but there's not been > a single namesys person involved. Similar all of you have absolutely ignore Al message had a reply. "namesys persons" is Hans Reiser. Sufficient ? > every single technical question or comment but started a flamefest > consisting mostly of personal attacs and "mine is longer" politics. no need to comment on this. -- "the liberation loophole will make it clear.." lex lyamin
