On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 11:15:59 +0200, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tonnerre wrote: > >Because KDE people hate Gnome people and vice versa, and because the > >rest of the world just neglects the two races for political reasons. > This is completely wrong. Neither KDE people hate GNOME people > nor viceversa. > > Time ago, I repeat in a conference the GNOME people need to jump > on the KDE wagon, so the train will move to a single direction, and > people does not approve this comment. > > More than on the license, QPL, there are a developer problem.
KDE is covered with LGPL/GPL licence, so is QT, so I don't see a problem here. > Develop in C (Gtk, GNOME) is a lot more easy than develop in C++ > (Qt, KDE) Well, some ppl knowing well C++ will say something completly different. Since I've started QT/KDE development, my life as developer has changed. I am developing everything in QT, as far as desktop stuff goes. And it's much more clear and easier. You just need to lear C++ well ;) > But, for the GUI, the C++ approach is a lot superior ... a lot. > > The problem is this. They start to develop on Gtk to create GNOME, in C > for a license problem. > I don't agree FreeDesktop.org, because it is handled by a RedHat employee > and the code is made on Gtk2, generally. > > ... They are not neutral. Agreed. -- GJ
