Hey, you know how device nodes have a bit set, indicating that they're device nodes and not regular files? Can a set of such properties be defined for reiser4 metadata properties?
Like a "metadata" bit so you can distinguish (if you wish) between regular files and metadata objects, and in addition an "archivable metadata" bit which indicates that the given piece of metadata is not automatically generated and should be archived during backup (some manually-generated metadata which does not need to be backed up will not have this bit set -- perhaps add another flag indicating that it's not automatic but unnecessary to archive).
- Re: The argument fo... David Masover
- Re: The argument fo... Spam
- Re: The argument fo... David Masover
- Re: The argument fo... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: The argument fo... David Masover
- Re: The argument for fs assi... Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com
- Re: The argument for fs assi... Spam
- Re: The argument for fs... Martin J. Bligh
- Re: The argument for fs assi... Spam
- Re: The argument for fs... David Masover
- Re: The argument for fs assi... Timothy Miller
- Re: The argument for fs assistan... Hans Reiser
- Re: The argument for fs assistan... David Masover
- Re: The argument for fs assi... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: The argument for fs assi... Hans Reiser
- Re: The argument for fs assistance i... Robin Rosenberg
- Re: The argument for fs assistance in handlin... Hans Reiser
- Re: The argument for fs assistance in handlin... Chris Dukes
- Re: The argument for fs assistance in handlin... Horst von Brand
- Re: The argument for fs assistance in ha... Helge Hafting
