On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote: > Actually, I think we need a new flag field in the inode_security_struct > to explicitly mark these "private" inodes for SELinux, so that > inode_has_perm() can skip permission checking on them while still > applying checks to any other inodes that may have the kernel SID (e.g. > /proc/pid inodes for kernel threads).
Agreed. - James -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
