With this patch get reiser4[cc1(10284)]: check_blocks_bitmap (fs/reiser4/plugin/space/bitmap.c:1174)[zam-623]: code: -2 at fs/reiser4/search.c:1285 reiser4 panicked cowardly: assertion failed: reiser4_find_next_zero_bit(bnode_working_data(bnode), end_offset, start_offset) >= end_offset
details at http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/12-07-04/zam-patch/ which is pretty much the same thing documented in 11-20-04/sync_mount/ , 11-10-04/with_bitmap.c.diff/ , 11-09-04/ , 11-08-04/test2/ , 11-04-04/all-R4/ , and 11-04-04/R3-R4/ When I also used Vladimir's "10 Nov 2004 19:08:47 +0300" bitmap.c.diff, my logs filled (~1.7 million lines) with WARNING: Wrong level found in node: 1 != 0 reiser4[cc1(11554)]: parse_node40 (fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node40.c:767)[nikita-494]: code: -2 at fs/reiser4/search.c:1312 see 12-07-04/both-patches/ The only other time I've seen an error like this was 11-08-04/test1/ repeating WARNING: Failed to delete file body 84672 reiser4[make(22140)]: parse_node40 (fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node40.c:767)[nikita-494]: code: -2 at fs/reiser4/search.c:1278 If you want, I'll run it again and probably hit the reiser4_find_next_zero_bit error instead. I didn't bother with fsck.reiser4 --build-fs and --check because now that I think about it, this isn't the sort of thing fsck needs to be able to fix. If fsck should be able to handle these cases, someone speak up and I'll provide more reports like 11-20-04/sync_mount/corruption/. On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 15:20 +0300, Alex Zarochentsev wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:45:40PM -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote: > > Does this show what you want? > > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/11-10-04/with_bitmap.c.diff/ > > Please apply the patch below. it definitely fixes one reiser4/amd64 bug. > > > ===== plugin/space/bitmap.c 1.183 vs edited ===== > --- 1.183/plugin/space/bitmap.c Wed Oct 13 17:22:01 2004 > +++ edited/plugin/space/bitmap.c Sun Dec 5 00:18:55 2004 > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ > static int > find_next_zero_bit_in_word(ulong_t word, int start_bit) > { > - unsigned int mask = 1 << start_bit; > + ulong_t mask = 1 << start_bit; > int i = start_bit; > > while ((word & mask) != 0) { > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ > /* search for the first set bit in single word. */ > static int find_last_set_bit_in_word (ulong_t word, int start_bit) > { > - unsigned bit_mask; > + ulong_t bit_mask; > int nr = start_bit; > > assert ("zam-965", start_bit < BITS_PER_LONG); -- Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
