Hello On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 21:09, Redeeman wrote: > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 20:30 +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: > > Hello > > > > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 18:22, Redeeman wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 16:55 +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 22:56, Redeeman wrote: > > > > > hello.. reiser4 is now in mm, but i realize that nearly all of the > > > > > stuff > > > > > that was mm specific when the move to mm was made, are probably merged > > > > > into upstream by now, i wonder, can anyone tell me exactly what from > > > > > mm > > > > > it depends on? > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > reiser4 got included into mm not because it needed something of it, but > > > > rather because it is supposed that being in mm for certain amount of > > > > time reiser4 will get a lot of testing and will prove that it is worth > > > > to get included into stock kernel. > > > im aware, however, the reiser4 patches in mm are against mm, which means > > > it depends on something from it, and i'd like to find out what :D so > > > that i can take it out and apply to vanilla along with reiser4 > > > > did you see ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9? > > It contains all things which reiser4 depends on. > nice > > > > If you would like to add reiser4 to vanilla kernel yourself you would > > have to add reiser4 patches of mm kernel to vanilla one: > > > > people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.X/2.6.X-mmY/broken-out/reiser4-* > > and add the patch i am attaching to this email. > > > yeah i tried that, however they dont patch against latest vanilla, it > would seem the vfs has changed abit.. i just wondered if anyone knew > exactly which of the mm patches was needed to make up for this, but, now > you gave me that url :) never mind.. >
Ah, yes, you are right, there is a patch which rejects. But, I guess that if we keep ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/ uptodate - that would be ok and we would not have to release separate patches for vanilla kernel? > thanks
