> On Monday 20 December 2004 17:32, Spam wrote:
>> What happen with the performance when these barriers are active? > It's faster than with disk writecache off. > I didn't benchmark barriers=flush and writecache on. >> >> Is it only during power failure the data in the write cache is lost? > No. See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/153296/EN-US/ I think the answer to my question was yes. That link is about disk cache not flushed properly before Windows shuts the computer off. >> >> Also, does anyone know if the data in the disk write cache is >> written out if the system crashes/freezes. Power failure is not a >> very common occurrence, but crashes are much more so. > The cache should stay intact as long the harddisk is supplied with power. So, the question remains. Will the drive flush its cache if it still has power or does it need to receive some kind of flush command from the OS? If not, then a OS crash will not harm the integrity of the data in the cache and the disk will flush it out. >> >> Is it possible to detect if filesystem was unmounted due to power >> failure or due to a kernel crash? > Kernel panics don't tend to reset the machine but output a dump to the > console /syslog via network and halt the machine. > If you have a UPS supplier supporting linux you will receive a power failure > notification event to take proper action. > For example: http://www2.apcupsd.com/ No, I meant through software. So that fsck could detect if system lost power and therefore make a more thorough test. If you have UPS then write-cache should never be dangerous? ~S --
