Reiser4 CPU usage is reasonable now I think. If you experience that it
is too high, use the extents only mount option, and it should be pretty
good. Maybe somebody has some time to create some numbers? I could be
wrong, but let us look at numbers.....
Hans
Markus T�rnqvist wrote:
Think I remember some other filesystem being really lightweight CPU.
UFS or something. But XFS shouldn't be too bad. Where does your
"probably" come from?
UFS as in Unix File System? Eww..
Dunno about CPU usage, but I tested XFS once and it was painfully slow.
Fortunately it got better, so maybe my test was somewhat flawed.
Maybe the Namesys guys would want to release some new and up-to-date
benchmarks now that the AMD64 panic bug is fixed?
