Lexington Luthor wrote: > David Masover wrote: > >> Don't know about ocfs, I'll look it up later. >> >> But, AFAIK, GFS is for things like ATA-over-ethernet, where you have >> multiple machines attached to the same hard drive -- not for situations >> where multiple machines each have their own drive, and you want them to >> appear as one logical drive. >> > > GFS uses shared storage, but that does not mean it needs to be central. > > I imagine one can use GFS in a cluster of machines where each machine > shares its drive as a block device, which can be combined using LVM to > create one giant logical network drive which can be mounted using GFS on > each machine.
Great -- no load balancing or local caching at all, then?
