On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:16:11 PDT, Hans Reiser said: > Hellwig, people who write slow file systems should not lecture their > measurably superiors on how to code. Oh, and I should mention that > other people besides me have measured reiser4, and concluded it is twice > the speed of the other Linux filesystems, so don't go claiming it is > just my benchmarks. What you are doing is keeping me from doing a real > code review myself by keeping my guys so busy that they don't have time > to review the fixmes I inserted and would insert more of if I thought > they had time for them.
Hans, unfortunately the most obvious reading of the above is "Reiser4 is so damned fast because it doesn't bother doing sanity-checking". If there's still more "fixmes" to be inserted that *you* know of, and there are so many that there's no time to fix them, why is this being submitted for inclusion? On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:09:08 PDT, Hans Reiser said: > Of course, the reiser4 code is not as stable as it was before the > changes Christoph asked for. This sort of claim requires proof - can you point at *specific* things that were less stable after you fixed the code, including explaining why they're less stable?
pgpSbMPr0RKqd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
