;-) Thanks,
Hans Islam Amer wrote: >On 9/28/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Check out the latest cfq in the latest kernel, it is much better than >>the others for most applications. Anticipatory used to be the best, but >>cfq-3 is better now. >> >> >> >Yes I always had my eyes on the applicable parts of -ck patchset >becasue they showed good promise ( upto my limited understading ). I >just needed an educated opinion. Thanks. > >And I had to drop using the genetic-as because it oopsed with >reiserfs in some kernels. > >Problem is lots of experimental patches in -mm series hurt throughput >and performance and reiser4 users have to suffer. Otherwise we have to >go through the slightly non-trivial procedure of patching the vanilla >kernel. > > > >
