On November 9, 2005 12:38 pm, michael chang wrote:
> On 11/9/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering everything you are working on (it's great, by the way -
> keep up the good work, we (the users) appreciate it!), this is
> probably irrelevant, but you can do what little schoolchildren do:
> call them Peter F and Peter H (or Peter van H), provided they agree.
> That should be a reasonable compromise?

"pvh" is a fine substitute for Peter when there is ambiguity -- I've been 
using it long enough now that it looks like my name to me.

-pvh

-- 
Peter van Hardenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Victoria, BC, Canada

Reply via email to