On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:47:32 -0800, Peter van Hardenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...] > Hans, I like the idea that files should be (for those who want it) > treatable indistinguishably from directories. The contained-by would > get very tedious with deep nesting, as that is already how the / > translates for me. > I propose this: > files /are/ a normal directory (for resources) and /have/ an invisible > subdirectory (for attributes) (perhaps "fivedot"?). I don't know how hard it would be, but I think it would be best to make your code as generic as possible, so that it can be changed to make subfiles accessible as robert/hat-size, robert/...../hat-size, etc. (I'm not saying that it should be accessible by those names at the same time, but it should be possible to, say, make a 10-line change in the code to switch it from one to the other.) Intuition is great, and I don't want to downplay it, but IMHO sometimes it may be more revealing to actually try things out and see how it works. -- Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
