agree, timing based should be ok as well. all these should be configurable.
ming On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 21:53 -0500, michael chang wrote: > What about a per-file/directory/volume settable minimum interval [at > all three levels] at which files can be set as a new "version"? So > let's say I want only a new version every 8 hours, I go and set that > somewhere and there will only be a new version if the file has been > changed in the last 8 hours... or if it has been 8 hours since the > last change, or something of the sort. > > [That said, in that circumstance, if less than that, should we just > leave the last one we put in, or replace it with this one?] > > > On 11/12/05, Ming Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > :P yes, cat will modify the last access time as well. but is that really > > worthy a version? maybe so, since the version storage overhead is not > > big anyway. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 18:27 -0800, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > maybe cat not touch..... > > > > > > > -- > ~Mike > - Just my two cents > - No man is an island, and no man is unable.
