On Wednesday 23 November 2005 12:22, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > Sander wrote: > > Hesse, Christian wrote (ao): > >>On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:09, Sander wrote: > >>>My 'good' system: > >>>kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 > >>>OS: Debian Sid > >>>disks: 4x sata on Promise > >>>raid/lvm/etc: lmv stripe > >>> > >>>My 'bad' system: > >>>kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm1 > >>>OS: Debian Sid > >>>disks: ata on nForce2 > >>>raid/lvm/etc: none, single disk > >> > >>My 'bad' system: > >>kernel: everything from 2.6.14-rc3* to 2.6.15-rc1* > >>Compiler: GCC 3.4.4-r1 (including Gentoo patches) > >>OS: Gentoo ~x86 > >>disk: ATA on Intel ICH4-M (Centrino Notebook) > >>raid/lvm/etc: none, single disk > > > > Your Compiler suggestion is a good one. > > > > I added your data at http://humilis.net/reiser4slowdown assuming you > > don't mind (please let me know if you do mind). > > > > Reiser-dev team, do you need other info beside what is listed there? > > It could be useful if there were a description of a test which was used to > measure slowdown, result of that test on both "good" and "bad" kernels. > Information about good kernel is also needed.
For Sander's list: http://www.earthworm.de/tmp/reiser4-fsync.c strace -T -e sync,fsync reiser4-fsync Good kernels is everything 2.6.13* and before. -- Christian
pgpPk8Vrksnzj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
