Avuton Olrich wrote: >On 3/15/06, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Avuton Olrich wrote: >> >> >>>I just saw a thread on the LKML a minute ago asking about the state of >>>getting the patch into vanilla linux. I read Andrew Morton's post >>>about a month ago stating that it could happen soon, but was unlikely >>>due to there not actually being a need for it to go into mainline (no >>>major distro default, etc...). >>> >>> >>> >>Can you supply a reference to this post? The only distro which is not >>influenced by performance numbers when selecting a filesystem is RedHat, >>and most of the rest are just waiting to be sure that politics will not >>kill reiser4 inclusion. I am sure I can come up with a "we will support >>it if you let it in" petition of distros if such a silliness is needed. >> >> > >I was refering to this post: >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113775878722100&w=2 > >Thanks for all the answers >-- >avuton >-- > Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. > > Oh, well, the overall tone of that email is not all that negative.
We will work on the 4k at a time issue, overcome that issue technically, and then after that is resolved deal with generating desire for a filesystem that is 2x (reiser4.0) to 4x (4.1alpha with compression) faster.
