-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans Reiser wrote: > Jeffrey Mahoney wrote: > >> Hans Reiser wrote: >> >> >>> Sounds like acls or acl bugs. >>> >>> >> Or not, since ACLs weren't enabled on the mount. > > What happens if acls are used on one mount and not on another?
To clarify, ACLs are a per-super feature. For this example, there weren't multiple mount points with different options, so per-super and per-mount are one and the same. If you mean if ACLs are enabled on one file system and not on another, nothing unusual will happen. The behavior for copying from one FS to another is defined. - From ACL fs to non-ACL fs, the ACLs will be lost. - From non-ACL fs to ACL fs, unless "preserve permissions" is set, the files will inherit from an optional default ACL. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEQ7ONLPWxlyuTD7IRAqzPAJwLuf5BX2IlUuAnMJ0eAyqRO1lFCgCgkaPg eugu4Q/rk56Qryz6JQ8bJEg= =urun -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
