Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
[skip]
>
> How does reiser4 compare to ext3 now (if you measured it)?
>
Well, while writing messages to spool ext3 gives 240 msg/sec, while
reiser4 only 115 msg/sec. It was measured while acquiring 136000
messages, occupying more than 3 Gig storage. But while delivering these
messages from spool, reiser4 gives 155 msg/sec, while ext3 only 115
msg/sec rates.
Both filesystems were mounted with "noatime,nodiratime" options, at
FAST-80 WIDE SCSI 160.0 MB/s bus.
--
Sergey Ivanov
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Alexander Zarochentsev
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) mail
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Marcus Furlong
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) mail
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Vladimir V. Saveliev
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) mail
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Hans Reiser
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (versi... Vladimir V. Saveliev
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Sergey Ivanov
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Vladimir V. Saveliev
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (versi... Sergey Ivanov
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Alexey Polyakov
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Francesco Biscani
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) rvalles
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) rvalles
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) (or wha... Hans Reiser
- [BUG] reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 4) Francesco Biscani
- zam, can you look at this? Hans Reiser
- Re: zam, can you look at this? Alexander Zarochentsev
- Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3) Frieder Bürzele
