I haven't hit nikita-2967 again, but I got several other interesting
results.
The first panic didn't cause corruption:
reiser4 panicked cowardly: reiser4[pdflush(16048)]: scan_by_coord
(fs/reiser4/flush.c:3431)[nikita-3435]:
Kernel panic - not syncing: reiser4[pdflush(16048)]: scan_by_coord
(fs/reiser4/flush.c:3431)[nikita-3435]:
The second affected my root partition, not the one I was stress testing:
reiser4 panicked cowardly: reiser4[ent:hda3!(841)]:
capture_anonymous_pages (fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c:1007)[vs-49]:
Kernel panic - not syncing: reiser4[end:hda3!(841)]:
capture_anonymous_pages (fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c:1007)[vs-49]:
I booted from a live CD to document the corruption (which seemed to have been
completely fixed).
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck2_--check_hda3.txt.gz
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck2_--fix_hda3.txt.gz
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck2_--check_after_--fix_hda3.txt.gz
When I rebooted, I got another panic when my system tried to mount / read-write:
reiser4 pnicked cowardly: reiser4[mount(3614)]: check_blocks_bitmap
(fs/reiser4/plugin/space/bitmap.c:1268)[zam-623]:
Kernel panic - not syncing: reiser4[mount(3614)]: check_blocks_bitmap
(fs/reiser4/plugin/space/bitmap.c:1268)[zam-623]:
On the second reboot, it worked again.
The third panic was one I've seen before
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=115259665831650&w=2):
reiser4 panicked cowardly: reiser4[rm(25870)]: sibling_list_remove
(fs/reiser4/tree_walk.c:813)[zam-32245]:
Kernel panic - not syncing: reiser4[rm(25870)]: sibling_list_remove
(fs/reiser4/tree_walk.c:813)[zam-32245]:
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck3_--check.txt.gz
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck3_--fix.txt.gz
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck3_--check_after_--fix.txt.gz
The fourth was another repeat:
reiser4 panicked cowardly: reiser4[pdflush(198)]:
capture_anonymous_pages (fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c:1007)[vs-49]:
Kernel panic - not syncing: reiser4[pdflush(198)]:
capture_anonymous_pages (fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c:1007)[vs-49]:
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck4_--check.txt.gz
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck4_--fix.txt.gz
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060720/fsck4_--check_after_fix.txt.gz
Where the fsck logs from tests 3 and 4 say entries were removed, they
mean it. Those files were GONE. I would expect this to happen to
temporary files being written during the panic, but header files should
only have been open for reading if at all. I have metadata dumps from
before and after one of the fsck --fix runs. Should I make them
available?
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 18:07 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 07:28 -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote:
> > Thanks. Now with debug enabled I've gotten:
> >
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/panic1.txt.gz
>
> the attached patch fixes a problem nikita-2967 reports about. Would you
> please check whther it helps.
>
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/fsck1_--check.txt.gz
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/fsck1_--fix.txt.gz
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/fsck1_--check_after_--fix.txt.gz
> >
> > and
> >
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/messages2.txt.gz
> > followed by
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/messages2b.txt.gz
> >
> > and without debug:
> >
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/messages3.txt.gz
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/fsck3_--check.txt.gz
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/fsck3_--fix.txt.gz
> > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/fsck3_--check_after_--fix.txt.gz
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 18:18 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 00:52 -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the patch, but I can still reproduce the problem. I've been
> > > > running the attached program to try to speed up the testing process a
> > > > bit. Interrupting and restarting the compilation loop also seems to
> > > > help.
> > > >
> > >
> > > ok
> > >
> > > > If I had hours to wait, it would probably crash eventually without
> > > > additional encouragement, but I'm doing everything as an unprivileged
> > > > user, so I don't think my tests are unreasonable.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I'm still getting a panic with debug enabled:
> > > >
> > > > reiser4 panicked cowardly: reiser4[find(16411)]: reiser4_dirty_inode
> > > > (fs/reiser4/super_ops.c:173)[]:
> > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: reiser4[find(16411)]: reiser4_dirty_inode
> > > > (fs/reiser4/super_ops.c:173)[]:
> > > >
> > >
> > > The attached patch should fix the above.
> > >
> > > > Without debug enabled I've seen:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060718/messages1.txt.gz
> > > > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060718/fsck1_--check.txt.gz
> > > > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060718/fsck1_--fix.txt.gz
> > > > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060718/fsck1_--check_after_--fix.txt.gz
> > > >
> > > > but usually I get:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060718/messages3.txt.gz
> > > >
> > > > with no corruption (although I've been rebooting before complete
> > > > failure).
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 21:38 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> > > > > Hello
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 18:10 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> > > > > > Hello
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 12:44 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > > > Has my previous post
> > > > > > > (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=115259665831650&w=2)
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > overlooked, or have I not provided enough information? Do I need
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > reproduce these issues on 2.6.18-rc1-mm2? Should I be trying any
> > > > > > > patches?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > please try the attached patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > > your test crashes reiser4 on my test box. I hope to get a patch
> > > > > > ready
> > > > > > later today. Not sure that I got the same problem as you, though. We
> > > > > > will see.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The bottom line is with 2.6.17-mm6, I've always been able to OOPs
> > > > > > > or panic
> > > > > > > reiser4 on my amd64 machine (haven't tried x86 yet) by using all
> > > > > > > available
> > > > > > > physical memory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
--
Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
