On Mon, 2006-07-31 18:44:33 +0200, Rudy Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-07-31 17:59:58 +0200, Adrian Ulrich > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A colleague of mine happened to create a ~300gb filesystem and started > > > to migrate Mailboxes (Maildir-style format = many small files (1-3kb)) > > > to the new LUN. At about 70% the filesystem ran out of inodes; Not a > > > > So preparation work wasn't done. > > Of course you are right. Preparation work was not fully done. And using > ext1 would also have been possible. I suspect you are still using ext1, > cause with proper preparation it is perfectly usable.
Oh, and before people start laughing at me, here are some personal or
friend's experiences with different filesystems:
* reiser3: A HDD containing a reiser3 filesystem was tried to be
booted on a machine that fucked up DMA writes. Fortunately, it
crashed really soon (right after going for read-write.) After
rebooting the HDD on a sane PeeCee, it refused to boot. Starting
off some rescue system showed an _empty_ root filesystem.
* A friend's XFS data partition (portable USB/FireWire HDD) once
crashed due to being hot-unplugged off the USB. The in-kernel XFS
driver refused to mount that thing again, and the tools also
refused to fix any errors. (Don't ask, no details at my hands...)
* JFS just always worked for me. Though I've never ever had a broken
HDD where it (or it's tools) could have shown how well-done they
were, so from a crash-recovery point of view, it's untested.
* Being a regular ext3 user, I had lots of broken HDDs containing
ext3 filesystems. For every single case, it has been easy fixing
the filesystem after cloning. Just _once_, fsck wasn't able to fix
something, so I did it manually with some disk editor. This worked
well because the on-disk data structures are actually as simple as
they are.
ext3 always worked well for me, so why should I abandon it?
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-7608481
Signature of: If it doesn't work, force it.
the second : If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
