--- Edward Shishkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ricardo (Tru64 User) wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> Hello
> 
> > I read on reiserfs site, faq #1, about max file
> sizes:
> > max file size 2^60 - bytes => 1 Ei, 
> > but page cache limits this to 8 Ti on
> architectures
> > with 32 bit int for reiserfs 3.6
> > 
> > I do have a reiserfs 3.6 filesystem, on kernel 
> > 2.6.12-21mdksmp (mandriva 2006) that would not
> take a
> > filesize greater than 2TB!
> > 
> > Filesize in question::
> > -rw-r--r--  1 myuser users 2147483647 Aug  1 16:41
> > myfile.out
> 
> Hmm.. actually this file has size 2GB, not 2TB.
> Did you try to specify O_LARGEFILE when creating a
> file?
> (man creat)
> 
> > 
> > Error received:
> > "Filesize limit exceeded"
> > 
> > This filesystem is on a scsi device connected via 
> > Adaptec AIC-7899P U160/m card (if it matters).
> > 
> > # debugreiserfs /dev/sda1
> > debugreiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
> > 
> > 
> > Filesystem state: consistency is not checked after
> > last mounting
> > 
> > Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x801 of
> format
> > 3.6 with standard journal
> > Count of blocks on the device: 292967356
> > Number of bitmaps: 8941
> > Blocksize: 4096
> > Free blocks (count of blocks - used [journal,
> bitmaps,
> > data, reserved] blocks): 172310677
> > Root block: 121672
> > Filesystem is NOT clean
> > Tree height: 5
> > Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
> > Objectid map size 2, max 972
> > Journal parameters:
> >         Device [0x0]
> >         Magic [0x5613f7b2]
> >         Size 8193 blocks (including 1 for journal
> > header) (first block 18)
> >         Max transaction length 1024 blocks
> >         Max batch size 900 blocks
> >         Max commit age 30
> > Blocks reserved by journal: 0
> > Fs state field: 0x0:
> > sb_version: 2
> > inode generation number: 1507612
> > UUID: 78e233e1-8210-4c9f-8f5d-7159c754db16
> > LABEL: 
> > Set flags in SB:
> >         ATTRIBUTES CLEAN
> > 
> > Any idea why i would receive this limitation, with
> a
> > 2.6 kernel and reiserfs 3.6? Can this be corrected
> to
> > allow the full file size?
> > I would appreciate any hints....
> > I check the kernel-sources for the kernel version
> i am
> > running, and i dont see any mention of "large
> > file/filesystem support" that i recall was
> available
> > in  older kernel compiles, so it is probably
> > integrated now?
> > 
> > 
> > _Thanks
> > 
> > Richard


Ohh yes.....my (user's) fault. This is an application
limitation (fortran) probably for not using the right
switch. And, yes, the file size i posted is only 2gb!
Please ignore this post.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to