Le jeudi 30 juillet 2009 05:55:58, Andrea Diamantini a écrit : > On Thursday 30 July 2009 00:31:22 Lionel Chauvin wrote: > > What do you think about the idea using KRunner engine for the "awsome > > bar" > > Why not? It seems actually the most awesome bar. Need to lurk a bit at its > code.. > > And... another think. I thought about your idea of removing the > QStackedUrlBar and let rekonq remain with just one urlbar. > Perhaps we need to work in this direction in that branch (the "infamous" > branch of one branch), doing > > master =====> OneUrlBarRekonq =====> AwesomeUrlBar > > And obviously, this is a 0.3 target. > What do you think about?
I create a OneUrlBar branch on my repo. The source code size has decreased of 174 lines. Now, each tab use less memory. I believe it works right. With some tests, it could be merged in mainline. Can you tell me why at the begining you create several bars ? What was your intention ? Lionel. _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
