On Saturday 08 August 2009 11:32:24 Lionel Chauvin wrote: > > No sorry. I thought it's an unuseful and expensive tasks. Read my last > > mail about.. > > I think I did not received your last mail. > > in the last I receive you say: > >Sure! > >I'm going to provide a RekonqAccessManager branch to work on this topic.
I was just saying it's not a simple task porting it. And it's quite unuseful. So, perhaps the best thing is (as you said initially, I think): - provide QNetworkAccessManager just for KDE 4.2 and just for rekonq 0.2 - provide KIO::AccessManager for KDE 4.3 and every rekonq from now on That's all. Is this ok for you? -- Andrea Diamantini, rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.sourceforge.net IRC: adjam_AT_freenode GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
