On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Andrea Diamantini<[email protected]> wrote: > Here we are, after two beta releases to fixing bugs and let translators work, > we have our 0.2 release! > > In this release we are starting to explore simpler and more beautiful UI (not > final yet, anyway), refactoring some code, give a try to webkitKDE and the KIO > porting of Qt NetworkAccessManager. > As these last thinks seems not yet stable, we decided to go for 0.2 with > QtWebKit and just "partial" KIO::AccessManager support, but our eyes and > intentions are pointed to the KDE classes. > > We also decided to continue development in git (and gitorious), waiting for > the BIG kde switch. So, it's us, waiting for KDE. Funny ;) > > rekonq improvements from previous 0.1.0 release: > - New (again) and unique loading url bar (and expect something better for > 0.3..) > - Integrated google search (CTRL+L to have urlbar focus, type ciao, click > enter and search google for it!) > - simpler and better UI (again, NOT final!!) > - new experimental notification system > - KDE Web shortcuts support (gg:ciao search google for ciao, wp:ciao search > wikipedia for it) > - Improved Contextual actions menu > - KDE cookie system support > - tons of bugs fixed > > rekonq 0.2 seems a really beautiful release and a huge step forward 0.1. > Anyway, it is surely NOT (yet) intended for production. > Perhaps 0.3 will be. Who knows? > > As usual, download it from our sourceforge site (waiting for a rekonq.kde.org > domain.. ) or from the beautiful kde-apps. > > Do it now! > And enjoy! > > -- > Andrea Diamantini, adjam > GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F > > rekonq project > WEB: http://rekonq.sourceforge.net > IRC: rek...@freenode > _______________________________________________ > rekonq mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq >
[ silly me, i forgot to forward this to the mailinglist ] Congratulations Andrea and Team! I'm glad to announce that 0.2 is (still) under review for Fedora ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 ). I know I started with submitting 0.1 but there were a few things from my side that needed to be sorted out besides the licensing issue, which is supposed to be resolved now (see comment #6 in the report). Now it's just waiting for the reviewer to finished the review and then I can commit it to Fedora. :) Keep up the good work! -- Eelko Berkenpies http://blog.berkenpies.nl/ _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
