On Sunday 22 November 2009 16:07:41 nehlsen wrote: > are there any plans for plugins? > > i think a general plugin infrastructure is the key for a [very] good > browser. it gives people (like me) the possiblity to extend the browser > without touching the core. e.g. the bookmarks panel which i did, is imho > not used by many people, so it would be a good idea to put something like > that into a plugin. > > blocks which i think should be plugins: > - adblock > - web shortcuts > - click to flash
What let you think this? > i did some reading and testing and i think i can implement this into > rekonq. > > any thoughts? > maybe, wait until 0.5? > or "this should be done by somebody more experienced or more into the whole > rekonq source"? i don't want to put my time into it if it's just gonna be > rejected (not that i think it would ;) > > so? I have three big problems with plugins: 1. don't think they are essential 2. don't fit well with my main "lightweight browser" idea and most important.. 3. let application crash when they crash So, I think that before starting working on, you have to demonstrate me I'm wrong. -- Andrea Diamantini, adjam GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.sourceforge.net IRC: rek...@freenode _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
