On Saturday 20 February 2010 22:36:29 Frank Karlitschek wrote: > On Saturday 20 February 2010 20:39:14 Andrea Diamantini wrote: > > About the discussion on rekonq.. I'm really glad (and a bit astonished) > > of this thread. Frank is one of our best fans and he started saying > > about that from 0.0.x releases. I cannot believe he really did it!! :D > > hehe. True. > I'm amazed by the speed you are moving rekonq forward. :-)
:) > > It's quite obvious from my POV that rekonq is not "ready". While I'm > > thinking this 0.4 release can be really nice for an user searching a > > lightweight and clean browser (trying to be) well integrated with KDE > > technologies. > > I agree with Aaron that there is a place for the swiss army knife browser > konqueror and for a more specialized browser like rekonq. > > *ready* of course always depends on the personal viewpoint. > For me rekonq is already a great browser which I use every days. :-) Of course, I use it, too. ;) It's ready for me, not sure it's ready for my wife. > I can completely understand your point. But from a "KDE software > compilation" viewpoint a nice enduser friendly default browser is also a > good thing. > > When do you think rekonq is *ready* ? >From rekonq POV, if we'll implement all points for 0.5 release (a new and improved urlbar, adblock auto-updates && config dialog review the most important steps) we are near to be ready. At least for a first presentation to a wider audience. The most important thing is anyway not rekonq directly dependant. kdewebkit is just to its first release and a lot of work has to be done there. But the most important thing is QtWebkit: we'll fly if it will fly. > Cheers > Frank -- Andrea Diamantini, adjam GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.sourceforge.net IRC: rek...@freenode _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
