I fully agree that Rekonq should concentrate on the KDE Platform and Desktop first and then Plasma Netbook. But after that reducing dependencies may be beneficial for Plasma Mobile (if rekonq is ever targeting that at all but since the GUI is already flexible, I think it'd make sense).
On Thursday 26 August 2010 16:29:23 [email protected] wrote: > On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, ext Markus Slopianka wrote: > > I just had the idea that Rekonq (1.0?) with no/minimized KDE Platform > > dependencies could be proposed to MeeGo Netbook as default browser > > instead of current Google Chrome. > > I don't think it is a good idea in the short term. We are just starting to > work on Netbook, while Google already made improvements. There are cases > where QtWebKit is faster than Chrome on Desktop, those are generally > slower on Atom. > > Still, I think the question is interesting. How hard do you think it would > be to have a version of Rekonq without dependency on KDE? > > cheers, > Benjamin _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
