A Dimarts, 31 d'agost de 2010, laurent Montel va escriure: > On mardi 31 août 2010 01:02:04 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Hi, until yesterday, KDE translators have been translated a doc that was > > located at > > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/doc/rekonq/?pathrev=1169512 > > > > Today/Yesterday Laurent removed it citing "moved to gitorious" > > I looked at git source and saw a doc. And in extragear this doc was not the > same, and not compile by default so for me rekonq dev forgot to remove it > when it moved to git. Perhaps it's not an error but for me the "two" doc > was different. > > > I went to http://www.gitorious.org/rekonq/mainline/trees/master/docs and > > found another docbook. Hurray for duplication! That i have no idea if it > > is newer, older or the same. > > > > The thing is that currently the KDE l10n workflow does not allow > > translation of docbooks not hosted in svn, so with Laurent removal of the > > doc in extragear/network, rekonq doc is effectively untranslatable. Not > > sure it matters, because if it was older than the docu in gitorious it's > > not that bad anyway. > > Waou... I didn't know that doc from apps which is in git is untranslatable. > Not good. > I thought that it was as po file. > > So kdevelop doc is not translatable too...
kdevelop does not have doc, or so i was told. > > So it's necessary to have a svn access for doc and git access for code. > > So feel free to revert my commit (but we must update doc I think) Yes, someone should put the updated doc meanwhile we (that is I) work on a solution that lets docs in git be translated. Albert > > > Regards > > > So yeah, we should fix this. > > > > Albert _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
