> On Jan. 17, 2011, 11:23 a.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > src/opensearch/opensearchengine.h, line 120
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100398/diff/2/?file=7146#file7146line120>
> >
> >     Could we change this name (or the other)? Having the same one when you 
> > are not really overriding it, is not good IMHO.

gasp.. this is obviously an overloading, not an overriding. Sorry.


- Andrea


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100398/#review944
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 16, 2011, 4:01 p.m., Lionel Chauvin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100398/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 16, 2011, 4:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> it is the first step of a cache system for suggestions.
> keep downloaded suggestions in memory.
> prevent downloaded it again.
> the completion list is more reactive.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/opensearch/opensearchengine.h c05501f 
>   src/opensearch/opensearchengine.cpp ef0f3f7 
>   src/opensearch/opensearchmanager.cpp 41e46ec 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100398/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lionel
> 
>

_______________________________________________
rekonq mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq

Reply via email to