> On Jan. 23, 2011, 10:41 p.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote: > > Can you explain a bit more what are your intentions for this cache?
In the futur, I would implement one timeout per opensearch engine. I still don't know how determine this timeout. With this patch, one week seems to be a good compromise. I would also add an option somewhere for disable timeout (static cache like currently). - Lionel ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100435/#review1042 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 23, 2011, 5:51 p.m., Lionel Chauvin wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100435/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 23, 2011, 5:51 p.m.) > > > Review request for rekonq. > > > Summary > ------- > > if a cached suggestion is older than one week it is downloaded again. > it allows the cache to be updated. > this timeout of one week will be modified in further patches. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/opensearch/opensearchengine.cpp 1522845 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100435/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Lionel > >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
