On 04/05/2011 08:02 PM, Anton Kreuzkamp wrote: > On Tuesday 05 April 2011 18:32:16 Felix Rohrbach wrote: >> Thanks for your answer! >> >> I don't think this is a good idea, as there are many people who just use >> one rekonq window, but several desktops (e.g. one desktop purely for >> browsing). If you don't want any new config options, I would suggest the >> following behaviour: >> >> - If there is a rekonq window on this desktop, open it there >> - else use the last activated window (or use the last created window) >> >> With your idea, I think we will get a lot of angry users because they are >> forced to use rekonq in a certain way. If we use my suggestion, everyone >> who wants one rekonq window per desktop just need to open a rekonq window >> once per desktop, so they have just a little more work. > I completely agree with you, in that. > It not only forces one to use rekonq in one way but to use it completely > contrary to what virtual desktops are thought for: Space. > It is the behaviour I would expect for activities, but not for vd as these are > made to have e.g. kdevelop on one and rekonq on another vd, so forcing to open > a link on the current vd (=>opening a new window if there's no rekonq-window > on the current vd) is imho not the way to go (it would just increase the > confusion about activities/vd). > > So I wouldn't offer the option to always open links in the current vd at all > (just my personal opinion). > > But the proposed standard-behaviour is exactly what I would expect, so you > have my support for that :)
Ok, sounds good. PS: Anton, thanks for pointing out your opinion :) -- Andrea Diamantini, adjam GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org IRC: rekonq@freenode _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
