> On April 5, 2011, 10:23 p.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote: > > src/application.cpp, line 266 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101033/diff/1/?file=13806#file13806line266> > > > > Q_FOREACH, please.
Andrea, is there a good reason why we don't use the "reader-friendly" keywords foreach, signals, slots and the like? Are we planning on using boost at some point ? - Pierre ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101033/#review2417 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 8, 2011, 2:13 p.m., Felix Rohrbach wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101033/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 8, 2011, 2:13 p.m.) > > > Review request for rekonq. > > > Summary > ------- > > If there is a rekonq window on the current virtual desktop and another > application opens a link, rekonq will prefer this window. With this patch, > rekonq also prefers windows that were activated most recently (old behaviour: > most recently created). > > branch: desktopAware > > > This addresses bug 237732. > /show_bug.cgi?id=237732 > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/application.h 3cd3c96 > src/application.cpp eda588a > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101033/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Felix > >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
