> On July 19, 2011, 6:20 p.m., Pierre Rossi wrote: > > src/settings/generalwidget.cpp, line 68 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102010/diff/1/?file=27506#file27506line68> > > > > and maybe the "---..." can go ? > > Andrea Diamantini wrote: > Sorry Pierre, you may have noticed I usually (k)Debug quite everything to > not start everytime a gdb session ;) > Time for some kDebug polish...
yeah I know, I tend to do a lot of that too, but too often take everything out. Now since kDebug is pretty powerful with kdebugdialog, I think we should probably look into getting some reserved logging channels for different components in rekonq (fire kdebugdialog and look at how many say KIO has). I don't know who to talk to to get some of those for ourselves, but I'd be up for some sorting work on the debug output, I guess we'd gain a lot from it when investigating bugs. - Pierre ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102010/#review4861 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 19, 2011, 4:37 p.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102010/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 19, 2011, 4:37 p.m.) > > > Review request for rekonq. > > > Summary > ------- > > Title says it all. Easy and safe, I hope. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/rekonq.kcfg dba770b > src/settings/generalwidget.cpp 9f6de0d > src/settings/settings_general.ui 0b27dab > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102010/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Andrea > >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
