> On Oct. 11, 2011, 9:31 a.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote: > > uhm... can we please wait after stable release for this? I'm not that sure > > we don't really need it...
Sure. - Furkan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102818/#review7237 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 10, 2011, 3:46 p.m., Furkan Üzümcü wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102818/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 10, 2011, 3:46 p.m.) > > > Review request for rekonq. > > > Description > ------- > > It is'nt used in anywhere and it's necessary to remove that code for the new > feature I'm working on. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mainview.cpp ca604b2 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102818/diff/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > Compiles and works. > > > Thanks, > > Furkan Üzümcü > >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
