On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Andrea Diamantini <[email protected]> wrote: > When feature was requested, I remember people asking for a way to > "duplicate" a tab with an URL. And I see this as the most common use case > for a "clone". Note also that no one complained about it :)
Well, although not a feature I would have killed for, I remember thinking it would be better to keep the tab history. Now that I'm working on draggable tabs, I think the need for preserving the dragged tab history is a bit more clear, and I wanted to unify what "Clone Tab" and dragging a tab do (because dragging a tab to another instance is basically cloning it in the other instance and closing the original). > Just let me finish saying that if you want to change implementation and > "improve" it completely cloning the tab (ie copying the tab history) you are > obviously welcome. Ok, I'll submit a patch and see if its popular :) Thanks for your repy. David E. Narváez _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
