Mayank Jha wrote: > I was going through the idea of adding support for chrome extensions into > rekonq! and I talked to Nikhil Marathe (who had worked on it before), he > told me that he could not carry on with the work as there were some > problems due to differences in the two webkit ports. Are you currently > working on this to remove differences between QtWebKit and Chrome webkit > ports? > Me? No.
> https://www.gitorious.org/~adjam/webkit/kde-qt-webkit I thought we > could start off with incorporating user scripts instead of chrome > extensions as mentioned in the extensions page of rekonq/kde/.. Are there > any similar problems in doing this? > I would /guess/ not, but I don't really know. A quick look up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greasemonkey#Equivalents_for_other_browsers might give some insight. Another thing which pops to my mind on cross browser extensions are user- supplied style sheets: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stylish > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Richard llom wrote: > >> mayank wrote: >>> Well, I had an idea of introducing Rekonq-extensions, thus enabling the >>> users to add and contribute extensions to the rekonq browser, ... >> See also: >> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/rekonq/Extensions >> and >> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/rekonq/Roadmap#Next_BIG_targets _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
