----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111567/#review36840 -----------------------------------------------------------
This review has been submitted with commit 9e47252ceb160d1fd9caba8b7c3793d763cb94d6 by Andrea Diamantini on behalf of Diego Soenens to branch master. - Commit Hook On July 18, 2013, 1:09 p.m., Diego Soenens wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111567/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 18, 2013, 1:09 p.m.) > > > Review request for rekonq. > > > Description > ------- > > The current m_autoScrollTimer interval of 100ms (10 FPS!) makes > auto-scrolling feel sluggish and unresponsive. > IMHO it should have the same interval as m_smoothScrollTimer (16ms) so that > it feels smooth and responsive. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/webtab/webview.cpp ce3f5a9 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111567/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Works perfectly on my system. CPU usage while auto-scrolling doesn't change > any more than it does while just scrolling with smooth scrolling enabled. > > > Thanks, > > Diego Soenens > >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
