Hi, Would anyone disapprove of the idea of renaming the user function class 'pdb' to 'structure' within the 1.3 line? The change would involve the renaming of the current user functions (including those of the 'tensor_pdb' branch) from:
pdb.create_tensor_pdb() pdb.read() pdb.vectors() to the user functions: structure.create_tensor_pdb() structure.read_pdb() structure.vectors() This would allow the function class to be non-PDB specific and hence user functions such as 'structure.read_cif()', etc. could be added. A few additional user functions could include things such as 'structure.create_inertia_pdb()' which duplicates the current 'pdb.create_tensor_pdb()' by creating a geometric representation of the inertia tensor, 'structure.write_pdb()', 'structure.write_cif()', etc. If someone wants these uncoded functions, or other new structural user functions, then you'll need to start writing them ;) Edward _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
