On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Sébastien Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ed, > > I am not sure I understand all what you say here... > > Am I right if I say that you propose to return the spin_id directly from > the intensity_*() functions ? This would simplify the code. Perfect.
That's what I meant. > What about not doing so for the intensity_generic function also ? What > difference would this make ? This is where I don't follow what you > say... That function is not already returning the spin_id, right ? Ah, the intensity_generic() function also needs to do this! But it should generate it differently - directly from the generic peak intensity file. Hope that clears things up. Regards, Edward _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
