Hi Michael, This naming is correct. I would like this to be called 'local_tm_model', as the names 'local_tm*' have been used consistently since 2003. The typo is actually in the new status.py module. I will fix this and commit the change in the 1.3 line.
Cheers, Edward On 12 April 2010 03:27, Michael Bieri <[email protected]> wrote: > > Follow-up Comment #44, task #6847 (project relax): > > Hi Edward > > There is a typing mistake in dauvergne_protocol.py by assinging the local tm > models. > > Here the patch: > > -------------------------- > > Status for local tm models is correctly assigned in dauvergne_protocol.py. > > > ----------------------------- > > Unfortunately, I committed it in the GUI line. SHould I reverse it? > > The patch file is attached. > > Cheers > > (file #8920) > _______________________________________________________ > > Additional Item Attachment: > > File name: patch Size:0 KB > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://gna.org/task/?6847> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Gna! > http://gna.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-devel mailing list > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel > _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
