Hi Han,

I just ran the full test suite, and there are still 2 errors.  These
are in the unit tests, which you can check with:

$ ./relax -u

I'm sure you'll be able to work out what is wrong and how to fix it.

Regards,

Edward



On 1 August 2011 14:15, Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you think it's ready, I can merge it back into the main line.  Just
> make sure you have all of the svnmerge updates applied and committed.
> I will run the test-suite with:
>
> $ ./relax -x
>
> and see if everything is now happy.  This new user function should one
> day be added to the GUI as well.  Hopefully the GUI in the gui_testing
> branch will now be flexible enough to be able to perform all of the
> small molecule work from the GUI.  This will require implementing many
> user functions as GUI elements in the future though.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edward
>
>
>
> On 1 August 2011 14:10, Han Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Edward,
>>
>> I checked that all tests pass now for reading xyz files and loading spins or
>> vectors. Do you think it is now the time to merge this branch to the main
>> line?
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Han
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> See my last post, it should not be a problem.  Have a look at r12832
>>> though, this is where I ran:
>>>
>>> $ svnmerge.py init
>>>
>>> and committed the change.  So merge tracking was already initialised
>>> on the xyz branch.  I don't think r13944 will cause a problem though.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Edward
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28 July 2011 10:45, Han Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I did exact the same as it is written in manual:
>>>> 1.  $ svnmerge.py init
>>>> 2.  svn ci -F svnmerge-commit-message.txt
>>>> 3. After I typed "svnmerge.py merge" it showed one conflict.
>>>> Is there something wrong?
>>>> Best
>>>> Han
>>>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ouch, how was that possible?  Merge tracking is already initialised on
>>>> the xyz branch.  This commit might cause some serious headaches :S
>>>> And reverting it might also be problematic :S
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Edward
>>>>
>>>> On 28 July 2011 10:15,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Author: han87
>>>> Date: Thu Jul 28 10:15:38 2011
>>>> New Revision: 13944
>>>> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=13944&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Initialized merge tracking via "svnmerge" with revisions "1-12830" from
>>>> svn+ssh://[email protected]/svn/relax/1.3
>>>> Modified:
>>>>   branches/xyz/   (props changed)
>>>> Propchange: branches/xyz/
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --- svnmerge-integrated (original)
>>>> +++ svnmerge-integrated Thu Jul 28 10:15:38 2011
>>>> @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
>>>> -/1.3:1-12935
>>>> +/1.3:1-12830 /1.3:1-12935
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>> This is the relax-commits mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
>>>> This is the relax-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
>>>>
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-devel mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel

Reply via email to