Hi, Ah, yes, I'd forgotten about that. You can now set yourself up for full commit access to the relax source code repository - you have been officially accepted as a full relax developer (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.devel/3861/focus=4675). This should make development incredibly quick and easy for you. Remember to use git-svn (or pure svn) to be able to push directly back to the repository with full commit access. Just be careful not to add large files to the repository. Fixing this R1 problem should not be too difficult, once you have data and a system test set up. The infrastructure should all be in place for this support.
Note that as I will be submitting a publication on the relaxation dispersion analysis in relax soon, I will have to merge the branch back and release relax 3.1.0. Some of the reviewers may want to look at the program with relaxation dispersion support. Therefore I cannot hold off making this release for too long. We can create dedicated branches after this for new code developments (matplotlib, interpolated back-calculated curves, etc.). It is not as easy as git to branch, but it is still very easy. I also plan on adding one more feature to the auto-analysis before making this release. That is to have an option for pure numeric solutions, pure analytic solutions, or mixed solutions. If the pure numeric solution is activated, then the analytic models can be optimised as they are very useful for replacing the grid search for the numeric models. But the final model selection will use the 'No Rex' and numeric solutions exclusively, and the optimised analytic models will not be considered. Such an option might be important for those people who are allergic to the analytic models ;) Cheers, Edward On 18 October 2013 09:35, Troels Emtekær Linnet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Edward. > > I would like to add a published dataset from for an R1rho experiment. > I have tried to analyse it at the current state of the relax disp, but it > seems to me that relax does not handle the loading of several R1 rates. > > Best > Troels > > Den 18/10/2013 09.24 skrev "Edward d'Auvergne" <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi, >> >> As the relaxation dispersion analysis in relax is almost complete >> within the relax_disp branch, I will look at merging this branch back >> into the relax trunk probably early next week. Please say if this >> will affect you. I will also then release relax version 3.1.0 with >> support for dispersion data. The change in minor number from 3.0 to >> 3.1 will be made due to the large number of changes that this >> relax_disp branch holds. Future developments of the dispersion >> analysis can then occur in new dedicated branches. >> >> Regards, >> >> Edward >> >> _______________________________________________ >> relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) >> >> This is the relax-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password >> reminder, or change your subscription options, >> visit the list information page at >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
