Hi Troels, You may have already done this, but you may wish to change the test name replacing the 'cpmg' part with 'r1rho'.
Cheers, Edward On 26 February 2014 08:36, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: tlinnet > Date: Wed Feb 26 08:36:29 2014 > New Revision: 22321 > > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=22321&view=rev > Log: > Added system test for bug 21344. > > Regarding bug #21344, (https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?21344) - Handling of in > sparse acquired R1rho dataset with missing combinations of time and spin-lock > field strengths. > > This test will fail with: > No intensity data could be found corresponding to the spectrometer frequency > of 799.7773991 MHz, dispersion point of 431.0 and relaxation time of 0.14 s. > Data for a dispersion point of 431.0 and time 0.14 does not exist, and so > some of the looping in collecting data for calculation must be wrong. > This behaviour and probably its solution is related to bug 21665, "Running a > CPMG analysis with two fields at two delay times" > (https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?21665). > > Modified: > trunk/test_suite/system_tests/relax_disp.py > > Modified: trunk/test_suite/system_tests/relax_disp.py > URL: > http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/trunk/test_suite/system_tests/relax_disp.py?rev=22321&r1=22320&r2=22321&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/test_suite/system_tests/relax_disp.py (original) > +++ trunk/test_suite/system_tests/relax_disp.py Wed Feb 26 08:36:29 2014 > @@ -265,6 +265,22 @@ > relax_disp.Relax_disp.opt_func_tol = 1e-5 > relax_disp.Relax_disp.opt_max_iterations = 1000 > relax_disp.Relax_disp(pipe_name="origin - relax_disp (Thu Jan 2 > 13:46:44 2014)", pipe_bundle="relax_disp (Thu Jan 2 13:46:44 2014)", > results_dir=self.tmpdir, models=['R2eff', 'No Rex', 'CR72', 'NS CPMG 2-site > expanded'], grid_inc=3, mc_sim_num=5, modsel='AIC', pre_run_dir=None, > insignificance=1.0, numeric_only=False, mc_sim_all_models=False, > eliminate=True) > + > + > + def test_bug_21344_cpmg_two_fields_two_delaytimes_fail_relax_disp(self): > + """U{Bug #21665<https://gna.org/bugs/?21344>} catch, the failure of > an analysis of a sparse acquired R1rho dataset with missing combinations of > time and spin-lock field strengths using auto_analysis.""" > + > + # Clear the data store. > + self.interpreter.reset() > + > + # Load the state. > + state = status.install_path + > sep+'test_suite'+sep+'shared_data'+sep+'dispersion'+sep+'bug_21344.bz2' > + self.interpreter.state.load(state, force=True) > + > + # Execute the auto-analysis (fast). > + relax_disp.Relax_disp.opt_func_tol = 1e-5 > + relax_disp.Relax_disp.opt_max_iterations = 1000 > + relax_disp.Relax_disp(pipe_name='base pipe', > pipe_bundle='relax_disp', results_dir=self.tmpdir, models=['R2eff'], > grid_inc=3, mc_sim_num=5, modsel='AIC', pre_run_dir=None, insignificance=1.0, > numeric_only=False, mc_sim_all_models=False, eliminate=True) > > > def test_bug_21665_cpmg_two_fields_two_delaytimes_fail_calc(self): > > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-commits mailing list > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
