Follow-up Comment #2, bug #21960 (project relax):
Actually, it is simply because of the fix for bug #21954. The absolute peak
intensity errors are bigger. But this is the same for all data - i.e. the
errors are scaled by some factor X. Therefore the optimised parameters are
identical, but the final chi-squared values are lower.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?21960>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
