Hi Edward. Good work. I look forward to see the result.
Best Troels On 21 Aug 2014 12:31, "Edward d'Auvergne" <edw...@nmr-relax.com> wrote: > Hi Troels, > > With the recent support for dynamically optimising a R1 parameter the > 'No Rex R1rho off res R1 fit' model has been merged into 'No Rex R1rho > off res'. To extend on this, I think that the 'No Rex R1rho off res' > model can be merged into 'No Rex'. That way, when the user chooses > the 'No Rex' model, it will be automatically determined if the fit > will be on-resonance or off-resonance, hence requiring R1, and if R1 > will be fixed or optimised. So everything will be automatic. > > The aim is to minimise what we present to the user. A single 'No Rex' > model is easy to understand - it is simply that no chemical exchange > process is present. This is independent of whether the data is > on-resonance or off-resonance or if the R1 parameter is fixed or > optimised for the off-resonance case. Note I am deliberately not > using CPMG vs. R1rho for this distinction as off-resonance fitting of > a R1 parameter for CPMG data will be a future feature, as is supported > in CATIA. > > What do you think? I have most of the changes now in place for this, > but have not committed it yet. > > Regards, > > Edward > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-devel mailing list > relax-devel@gna.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel > _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list relax-devel@gna.org To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
